Exploring the impacts of PowerPoint presentation on English major students’ engagement and learning

Authors

  • Baryalai Fazli Kabul University, English Language and Literature Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages & Literature, Kabul, Afghanistan Author
  • Abdullah Noori Kabul University image/svg+xml Author
  • Mohammad Rahim Janbaz Kabul University image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

DOI https://doi.org/10.68925/rt23kj40

Keywords:

PowerPoint presentation, student engagement, student learning, English major students, Kabul University

Abstract

PowerPoint presentations have become a commonly used instructional medium in university classrooms, including English language teaching. This study examined English-major students’ perceptions of PowerPoint use in relation to classroom engagement and learning at the Department of English Language and Literature, Kabul University. A quantitative descriptive survey design was employed. From a target population of 221 undergraduate students, 143 students were selected. Data were collected through a structured online questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The instrument was adapted from an existing measure and comprised 24 items organised around two dimensions: classroom engagement and learning. Responses were measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Content validity was assessed through review by two departmental experts, while a pilot study involving 20 students produced a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.83. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations, were used to summarise the data. The results showed an overall mean of 3.89 (SD = 0.94) for engagement and 3.89 (SD = 0.90) for learning. Within engagement, the highest mean was recorded for ease of following and understanding presentations (M = 4.19, SD = 0.69), whereas the lowest related to the need for extensive note-taking (M = 3.64, SD = 1.04). For learning, reviewing key points received the highest mean (M = 4.23, SD = 0.69), followed by clarity and readability of slide text (M = 4.21, SD = 0.68). The lowest learning-related mean concerned presentations preventing boredom (M = 3.72, SD = 1.04). Overall, students held generally positive perceptions of PowerPoint use for engagement and learning.

Views: 0Downloads: 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdellatif, Z. (2015). Exploring students’ perceptions of using PowerPoint in enhancing their active participation in the EFL classroom: An action research study. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 5, 36–39.

Aifan, H. (2022). Implementing a project-based collaborative learning approach using PowerPoint to improve students’ 21st-century skills. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753021103064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211030642

Bolkan, S. (2019). Facilitating student attention with multimedia presentations: Examining the effects of segmented PowerPoint presentations on student learning. Communication Education, 68(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1517895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1517895

Corbeil, G. (2007). Can PowerPoint presentations effectively replace textbooks and blackboards for teaching grammar? Do students find them an effective learning tool? CALICO Journal, 24(3), 631–656. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i3.631-656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i3.631-656

Croxton, J. (2016). 31 presentation software & PowerPoint alternatives for 2016. CustomShow.

Fatema, S. L. (2014). The impact of using PowerPoint on students’ learning and motivation in secondary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1672–1677.

Gier, V. S., & Kreiner, D. S. (2009). Incorporating active learning with PowerPoint-based lectures using content-based questions. Teaching of Psychology, 36(2), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739792

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. Allyn & Bacon.

Hadizadeh, A. (2025). Exploring the impact of multimodal language learning activities on oral skill development: A study of in-class oral speech, PowerPoint presentations, video, and blog projects in an international context. Journal of Language Research, 9(1), 52–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51726/jlr.1582727

Hadiyanti, K. W., & Widya, W. (2018). Analyzing the values and effects of PowerPoint presentations. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 21(Suppl.), 87–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v21iSuppl.935

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Lari, F. S. (2014). The impact of using PowerPoint presentations on students’ learning and motivation in secondary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1672–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.592

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.

Nouri, H., & Shahid, A. (2005). The effect of PowerPoint presentations on student learning and attitudes. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 53–73.

Ozaslan, E. N., & Maden, Z. (2013). The use of PowerPoint presentations in the Department of Foreign Language Education at Middle East Technical University. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 2.

Pratiwi, D., & Yulia, Y. (2024). Engaging students through PowerPoint: The power of multimodal learning. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.24289

Segundo, E., & Salazar, D. (2011). The efficacy of using PowerPoint presentations to improve grammar and vocabulary learning among students of the intermediate II level. Repositorio Institucional PIRHUA, Universidad de Piura.

Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/25148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/25148

Wang, M. J. (2011). Using multimodal presentation software and peer group discussion in learning English as a second language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 907–923. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.920

Wanner, T. (2015). Enhancing student engagement and active learning through just-in-time teaching and the use of PowerPoint. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 27(1), 154–163.

Yukiko, I.-S., & Wang, S. (2016). College-based case studies in using PowerPoint effectively. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1127745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1127745

Zhao, Y. (2007). Social studies teachers’ perspectives of technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 311–333.

Sewasew, D., Mengestie, M., & Abate, G. (2015). A comparative study on PowerPoint presentation and traditional lecture method in material understandability, effectiveness and attitude. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(2), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.2027

Downloads

Published

2026-11-11

How to Cite

Fazli, B., Noori, A., & Janbaz, M. R. (2026). Exploring the impacts of PowerPoint presentation on English major students’ engagement and learning. Aureviaj Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.68925/rt23kj40